H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lesley Charles vs Margaret Redfearn H2H: 1-0

Lesley Charles holds a 1–0 lead over Margaret Redfearn in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Lesley Charles won the 1981 Lee-On-Solent semifinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesley Charles
GBR Age 74 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Margaret Redfearn
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lesley Charles 6-2 6-2 Margaret Redfearn Match data May 16, 1981* SF Lee-On-Solent WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesley Charles — — — 1,796 198 139 58.8% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Margaret Redfearn — — — 1,549 7 9 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Lesley Charles Margaret Redfearn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1970 2–5 28.6% — 1,485 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
1971 7–7 50.0% — 1,519 0 1 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
1972 17–16 51.5% — 1,597 0 2 1981 5–4 55.6% — 1,538 0 0
1973 17–21 44.7% — 1,563 0 2 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
1974 28–18 60.9% — 1,664 0 4 — — — — — — —
1975 27–19 58.7% — 1,684 0 6 — — — — — — —
1976 22–12 64.7% — 1,703 0 8 — — — — — — —
1977 23–16 59.0% — 1,622 0 10 — — — — — — —
1978 3–4 42.9% — 1,628 0 10 — — — — — — —
1979 8–6 57.1% — 1,640 0 11 — — — — — — —
1980 23–7 76.7% — 1,731 0 15 — — — — — — —
1981 21–8 72.4% — 1,756 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Lesley Charles Margaret Redfearn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1971 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1972 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1973 1 1 2 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 12 10 22 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1974 — — — — 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 3 2 5 60.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1976 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1977 1 2 3 33.3% 14 8 22 63.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 5 0 5 100.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 — — — — — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 14 8 22 63.6% 64 44 108 59.3% 68 55 123 55.3% 14 17 31 45.2% Career 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Lesley Charles Margaret Redfearn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1970 1486 101.9 — — — — -9 — — 23.1% -1.92 0–1 — — -0.24 1979 1505 107.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — -0.07
1971 1519 107.4 — — — — — +51 +17 53.6% +0.11 1–3 (25%) — — +1.56 1980 1493 108.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.39
1972 1597 120.9 — — — — -141 +17 +16 50.6% +0.16 6–5 (55%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 +3.31 1981 1538 107.5 — — — — — — — 52.4% -0.38 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.31
1973 1564 110.6 — — — — -129 0 +50 43.9% -0.57 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.2 +1.62 1983 1520 96.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.24
1974 1665 128.9 — — — — — -25 +47 57.5% +0.82 9–5 (64%) 1–1 — +3.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 1685 136.7 — — — — -115 +10 +76 58.8% +0.90 4–6 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 94.8 +3.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1976 1704 121.5 — — — — -1 -11 +19 64.2% +0.94 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 98.5 +6.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1977 1622 121.1 — — — — +66 +69 +82 53.2% +0.39 12–4 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.2 +6.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 1628 119.8 — — — — — — +105 46.7% -0.80 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 1640 116.9 — — — — +67 — +65 55.2% +0.86 1–0 — — +2.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 1731 122.3 — — — — +29 -59 -77 69.7% +1.65 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 +2.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 1756 125.8 — — — — — — +2 65.7% +1.43 8–4 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1797 127.9 — — — — -25 +14 +40 56.5% +0.60 56–43 (57%) 23–18 (56%) 105.3 +9.91 Career 1550 109.0 — — — — — — — 47.1% -0.09 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.