H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lesley Charles vs Nerida Gregory H2H: 1-2
Nerida Gregory holds a 2–1 lead over Lesley Charles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Nerida Gregory leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lesley Charles won the 1979 Surbiton third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 74
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 70
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1979* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Lesley Charles | 6-3 6-0 | Nerida Gregory | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1977* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Nerida Gregory | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1975* | Sutton | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Nerida Gregory | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Charles | — | — | — | 1,797 | 198 | 139 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Nerida Gregory | — | — | — | 1,647 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Charles | Nerida Gregory | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1972 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1973 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1974 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1976 | 22–12 | 64.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1977 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 5–18 | 21.7% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1979 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1980 | 23–7 | 76.7% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 15 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1981 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 16 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |