H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lesley Charles vs Penny Moor H2H: 2-2
Lesley Charles and Penny Moor are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Penny Moor leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lesley Charles won the 1975 Dublin semifinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 74
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
Age 75
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1975* | Dublin | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Lesley Charles | 6-4 6-4 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| May 24, 1974* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lesley Charles | 6-0 6-2 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| May 18, 1973* | Guildford | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Penny Moor | 6-4 6-3 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1972* | Torquay | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Penny Moor | 6-1 7-5 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Charles | — | — | — | 1,797 | 198 | 139 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Penny Moor | — | — | — | 1,552 | 53 | 111 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Charles | Penny Moor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 7–21 | 25.0% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 22–12 | 64.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 23–7 | 76.7% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 15 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1981 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 16 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |