H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lesley Charles vs Sue Barker H2H: 0-1
Sue Barker holds a 1–0 lead over Lesley Charles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1974 Surbiton semifinal 2-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 74
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1974* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Sue Barker | 2-6 6-1 6-1 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Charles | — | — | — | 1,797 | 198 | 139 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Charles | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1971 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1972 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | 1973 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 21 | 1974 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 22 | 1975 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | 1976 | 22–12 | 64.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 24 | 1977 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 25 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 26 | 1979 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| 27 | 1980 | 23–7 | 76.7% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 15 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| 28 | 1981 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 16 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |