H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 2-0
Lesley Hunt holds a 2–0 lead over Betty Ann Grubb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1976 Houston third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1976* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 6-4 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1969* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 0-6 6-2 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lesley Hunt | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |