H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lesley Hunt vs Ching Ling Chang H2H: 1-0

Lesley Hunt holds a 1–0 lead over Ching Ling Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1974 Detroit round of 32 6-0 6-4.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lesley Hunt 6-0 6-4 Ching Ling Chang Match data Feb 23, 1974* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesley Hunt 1,949 306 244 55.6% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Ching Ling Chang 1,500 13 41 24.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesley Hunt Ching Ling Chang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1968 23–18 56.1% 1,595 0 1
19 1969 32–21 60.4% 1,731 0 2
20 1970 45–20 69.2% 1,920 0 6
21 1971 35–27 56.5% 1,833 0 7
22 1972 42–27 60.9% 1,906 0 8
23 1973 22–25 46.8% 1,871 0 8 1971 0–5 0.0% 1,467 0 0
24 1974 26–17 60.5% 1,931 0 9 1972 0–3 0.0% 1,442 0 0
25 1975 13–16 44.8% 1,875 0 9 1973 5–11 31.2% 1,445 0 0
26 1976 26–22 54.2% 1,848 0 9 1974 8–16 33.3% 1,466 0 0
27 1977 10–13 43.5% 1,782 0 10 1975 0–6 0.0% 1,411 0 0
28 1978 30–30 50.0% 1,828 0 10
29 1979 2–8 20.0% 1,764 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesley Hunt Ching Ling Chang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1968 15 11 26 57.7% 8 7 15 53.3%
19 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 12 9 21 57.1%
20 1970 10 4 14 71.4% 16 4 20 80.0% 19 12 31 61.3%
21 1971 7 4 11 63.6% 12 11 23 52.2% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 11 9 20 55.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1973 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1971 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1973 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 8 17 52.9% 1974 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1977 7 8 15 46.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1978 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
Career 54 40 94 57.4% 97 76 173 56.1% 112 76 188 59.6% 43 52 95 45.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 6 15 21 28.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesley Hunt Ching Ling Chang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1968 1596 113.5 -6 -6 53.1% +0.37 10–6 (63%) +0.86
19 1969 1732 122.8 -21 -73 -38 57.6% +0.31 8–6 (57%) -0.87
20 1970 1921 143.0 -94 -42 -67 66.7% +1.30 7–6 (54%) 0–1 -2.98
21 1971 1833 139.1 +31 -38 +13 56.7% +0.48 7–10 (41%) 7–1 (88%) 100.1 -0.26
22 1972 1906 147.2 +108 -126 -9 60.0% +0.86 10–6 (63%) 1–1 -7.27
23 1973 1871 154.6 +43 -156 +78 51.9% +0.24 2–10 (17%) 6–8 (43%) 90.2 -5.71 1971 1468 98.2 +43 0.0% -4.00 -0.06
24 1974 1932 150.2 -12 -224 +81 57.6% +0.57 8–7 (53%) 5–7 (42%) 100.2 -5.02 1972 1442 90.9 0.0% -4.50 +0.27
25 1975 1875 148.5 0 -153 +98 46.0% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 -4.68 1973 1445 99.8 +24 +44 34.3% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +1.08
26 1976 1848 147.0 +4 -51 +125 55.9% +0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.3 -4.87 1974 1467 93.7 +96 -3 35.8% -1.49 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 +0.93
27 1977 1783 132.1 -4 +124 43.6% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -1.93 1975 1412 92.1 7.7% -3.31 0–1 1–0 +0.28
28 1978 1828 138.3 -18 -111 +85 48.9% -0.10 11–6 (65%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 -3.81
29 1979 1765 115.9 -38 20.0% -2.20 -0.96
Career 1950 146.0 +8 -66 +19 55.1% +0.39 75–71 (51%) 31–32 (49%) 99.7 -6.89 1500 93.3 +96 +8 +44 28.3% -1.86 3–6 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 101.2 +4.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.