H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lesley Hunt vs Chris Evert H2H: 0-8

Chris Evert holds a 8–0 lead over Lesley Hunt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 4–0 on grass and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1976 Wimbledon third round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesley Hunt
Age 76
H2H
0 – 8
8 main draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 1976* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Lesley Hunt Match data
Apr 12, 1976 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Chris Evert 6-3 6-3 Lesley Hunt Match data
Aug 30, 1975* US Open Grand Slam R64 Clay Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Lesley Hunt Match data
Sep 7, 1974* US Open Grand Slam QF Grass Chris Evert 7-6 6-3 Lesley Hunt Match data
Jun 28, 1974* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Chris Evert 8-6 5-7 11-9 Lesley Hunt Match data
Mar 10, 1974* Dallas WTA 250 QF Hard Chris Evert 6-0 6-7(4) 6-3 Lesley Hunt Match data
Aug 12, 1972* Indianapolis WTA 250 QF Clay Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Lesley Hunt Match data
Sep 11, 1971* US Open Grand Slam QF Grass Chris Evert 4-6 6-2 6-3 Lesley Hunt Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lesley Hunt — — — 1,933 306 244 55.6% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesley Hunt Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4
16 — — — — — — — 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11
17 — — — — — — — 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15
18 1968 23–18 56.1% — 1,596 0 1 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27
19 1969 32–21 60.4% — 1,735 0 2 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39
20 1970 45–20 69.2% — 1,919 0 6 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51
21 1971 35–27 56.5% — 1,829 0 7 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60
22 1972 42–27 60.9% — 1,903 0 8 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71
23 1973 22–25 46.8% — 1,868 0 8 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78
24 1974 26–17 60.5% — 1,915 0 9 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85
25 1975 13–16 44.8% — 1,865 0 9 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93
26 1976 26–22 54.2% — 1,821 0 9 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101
27 1977 10–13 43.5% — 1,769 0 10 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110
28 1978 30–30 50.0% — 1,823 0 10 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116
29 1979 2–8 20.0% — 1,761 0 10 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122
30 — — — — — — — 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131
31 — — — — — — — 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137
32 — — — — — — — 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142
33 — — — — — — — 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146
34 — — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146