H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lesley Hunt vs Chris Evert H2H: 0-9

Chris Evert holds a 9–0 lead over Lesley Hunt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 5–0 on grass and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1976 Wimbledon round of 32 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesley Hunt
AUS Age 76
H2H
0 – 9
9 main-draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Lesley Hunt Match data Jun 27, 1976* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-3 6-3 Lesley Hunt Match data Apr 12, 1976 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Lesley Hunt Match data Aug 30, 1975* R64 US Open Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 7-6 6-3 Lesley Hunt Match data Sep 7, 1974* QF US Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 8-6 5-7 11-9 Lesley Hunt Match data Jun 28, 1974* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 7-5 6-1 Lesley Hunt Match data Jun 22, 1974* QF Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert 6-0 6-7(4) 6-3 Lesley Hunt Match data Mar 10, 1974* QF Dallas WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 6-0 Lesley Hunt Match data Aug 12, 1972* QF Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 4-6 6-2 6-3 Lesley Hunt Match data Sep 11, 1971* QF US Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesley Hunt — — — 1,949 306 244 55.6% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,610 1,228 158 88.6% 18 0 5 13 112 154

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesley Hunt Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 4
16 — — — — — — — 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 11
17 — — — — — — — 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 15
18 1968 23–18 56.1% — 1,595 0 1 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 27
19 1969 32–21 60.4% — 1,731 0 2 1974 97–7 93.3% — 2,450 2 40
20 1970 45–20 69.2% — 1,920 0 6 1975 85–7 92.4% #1 2,544 4 53
21 1971 35–27 56.5% — 1,833 0 7 1976 63–5 92.6% #1 2,545 6 62
22 1972 42–27 60.9% — 1,906 0 8 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,568 7 73
23 1973 22–25 46.8% — 1,871 0 8 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,607 8 80
24 1974 26–17 60.5% — 1,931 0 9 1979 81–14 85.3% #2 2,440 9 87
25 1975 13–16 44.8% — 1,875 0 9 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,468 11 95
26 1976 26–22 54.2% — 1,848 0 9 1981 64–9 87.7% #1 2,475 12 103
27 1977 10–13 43.5% — 1,782 0 10 1982 66–6 91.7% #2 2,491 14 112
28 1978 30–30 50.0% — 1,828 0 10 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,400 15 118
29 1979 2–8 20.0% — 1,764 0 10 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,409 16 124
30 — — — — — — — 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,428 17 133
31 — — — — — — — 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,422 18 139
32 — — — — — — — 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,334 18 144
33 — — — — — — — 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,285 18 148
34 — — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 148

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesley Hunt Chris Evert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 1968 — — — — 15 11 26 57.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0%
19 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 40 0 40 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8%
20 1970 10 4 14 71.4% 16 4 20 80.0% 19 12 31 61.3% — — — — 1975 26 2 28 92.9% 36 0 36 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7%
21 1971 7 4 11 63.6% 12 11 23 52.2% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 12 1 13 92.3% 11 0 11 100.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6%
22 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 11 9 20 55.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9%
23 1973 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5%
24 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1979 18 4 22 81.8% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5%
25 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2%
26 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 8 17 52.9% 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 1977 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3%
28 1978 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 6 10 16 37.5% 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 54 40 94 57.4% 97 76 173 56.1% 112 76 188 59.6% 43 52 95 45.3% — 326 37 363 89.8% 418 26 444 94.1% 205 33 238 86.1% 279 62 341 81.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesley Hunt Chris Evert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -7.71
18 1968 1596 113.5 — — — — — -6 -6 53.1% +0.37 10–6 (63%) — — +0.86 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.17
19 1969 1732 122.8 — — — — -21 -73 -38 57.6% +0.31 8–6 (57%) — — -0.87 1974 2450 180.5 — — — — -56 +162 -92 88.2% +3.37 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.59
20 1970 1921 143.0 — — — — -94 -42 -67 66.7% +1.30 7–6 (54%) 0–1 — -2.98 1975 2544 181.4 — — — — -55 +162 -225 89.2% +3.37 8–3 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 -5.18
21 1971 1833 139.1 — — — — +31 -38 +13 56.7% +0.48 7–10 (41%) 7–1 (88%) 100.1 -0.26 1976 2546 179.8 — — — — +44 +128 -121 86.5% +3.11 10–2 (83%) 6–4 (60%) 101.6 -3.21
22 1972 1906 147.2 — — — — +108 -126 -9 60.0% +0.86 10–6 (63%) 1–1 — -7.27 1977 2568 181.6 — — — — +148 +144 -101 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 -2.88
23 1973 1871 154.6 — — — — +43 -156 +78 51.9% +0.24 2–10 (17%) 6–8 (43%) 90.2 -5.71 1978 2608 179.5 — — — — +105 +63 -131 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.79
24 1974 1932 150.2 — — — — -12 -224 +81 57.6% +0.57 8–7 (53%) 5–7 (42%) 100.2 -5.02 1979 2440 178.4 — — — — +13 +292 +61 81.2% +2.78 12–2 (86%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 -3.99
25 1975 1875 148.5 — — — — 0 -153 +98 46.0% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 -4.68 1980 2469 177.6 — — — — +80 +330 +100 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -4.31
26 1976 1848 147.0 — — — — +4 -51 +125 55.9% +0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.3 -4.87 1981 2476 182.2 — — — — +9 +291 +130 86.1% +3.10 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.6 -3.95
27 1977 1783 132.1 — — — — — -4 +124 43.6% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -1.93 1982 2491 179.3 — — — — +62 +255 +73 88.2% +3.33 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 98.0 -4.01
28 1978 1828 138.3 — — — — -18 -111 +85 48.9% -0.10 11–6 (65%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 -3.81 1983 2400 176.5 — — — — +47 +316 +178 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.38
29 1979 1765 115.9 — — — — -38 — — 20.0% -2.20 — — — -0.96 1984 2410 175.5 — — — — +69 +207 +137 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.3 -4.61
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2429 176.4 — — — — +30 +241 +127 85.9% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -3.55
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2423 177.3 — — — — +9 +241 +113 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2335 176.3 — — — — +23 +294 +200 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.2 -4.20
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2286 173.9 — — — — +34 +319 +231 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.2 -3.52
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2167 158.6 — — — — +40 +347 +265 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.18
Career — 1950 146.0 — — — — +8 -66 +19 55.1% +0.39 75–71 (51%) 31–32 (49%) 99.7 -6.89 — 2610 182.0 — — — — +21 +194 -3 84.5% +2.92 164–50 (77%) 82–50 (62%) 105.8 -5.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.