H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Glynis Coles H2H: 3-2
Lesley Hunt holds a 3–2 lead over Glynis Coles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lesley Hunt leads 2–0 on carpet, while Glynis Coles leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1978 Filderstadt third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 76
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 72
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1978* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Lesley Hunt | 7-6 6-2 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1977* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Glynis Coles | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| May 21, 1976* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Glynis Coles | 6-4 7-6 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1976* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Dec 10, 1972* | Perth 2 | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-2 7-5 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Glynis Coles | — | — | — | 1,835 | 144 | 190 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Glynis Coles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 26–21 | 55.3% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 3–19 | 13.6% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 3 |