H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Kristien Shaw H2H: 2-0
Lesley Hunt holds a 2–0 lead over Kristien Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1972 Indianapolis third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1972* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lesley Hunt | 6-2 6-0 | Kristien Shaw | Match data |
| Sep 5, 1970* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 6-1 | Kristien Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Kristien Shaw | — | — | — | 1,929 | 119 | 141 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Kristien Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 23–25 | 47.9% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 2–13 | 13.3% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 29–24 | 54.7% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |