H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Laura Dupont H2H: 4-1
Lesley Hunt holds a 4–1 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lesley Hunt leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1978 Mahwah fourth round 6-4 2-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1978* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 6-4 2-6 7-6 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1975* | Westchester | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laura Dupont | 6-3 6-3 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1975* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 6-2 6-3 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Dec 13, 1974* | Perth | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-0 6-2 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1971* | Newport | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-4 6-1 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Laura Dupont | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |