H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 1-0
Lesley Hunt holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Pericoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1970 Roland Garros second round 3-6 7-5 5-4 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1970* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Lesley Hunt | 3-6 7-5 5-4 (ret.) | Lea Pericoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Lea Pericoli | — | — | — | 1,764 | 58 | 51 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Lea Pericoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 3 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 3 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 3 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |