H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Marcie Louie H2H: 5-1
Lesley Hunt holds a 5–1 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lesley Hunt leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1975 Mission Viejo third round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1975* | Mission Viejo | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 6-2 7-6 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1974* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Lesley Hunt | 6-4 6-0 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| May 3, 1974* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 6-3 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1973* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 6-3 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1972* | Fort Lauderdale Pro | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcie Louie | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1969* | Berkeley | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 11-9 6-1 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Marcie Louie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |