H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lesley Hunt vs Marcie Louie H2H: 5-1

Lesley Hunt holds a 5–1 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lesley Hunt leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1975 Mission Viejo round of 32 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lesley Hunt
AUS Age 76
H2H
5 – 1
6 main-draw meetings
Marcie Louie
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lesley Hunt 6-2 7-6 Marcie Louie Match data Oct 2, 1975* R32 Mission Viejo WTA 250 Hard
Lesley Hunt 6-4 6-0 Marcie Louie Match data Oct 17, 1974* R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Lesley Hunt 6-3 6-3 Marcie Louie Match data May 3, 1974* R32 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Lesley Hunt 6-3 6-3 Marcie Louie Match data Apr 7, 1973* R16 Philadelphia WTA 250 Carpet
Marcie Louie 2-6 7-5 6-3 Lesley Hunt Match data Feb 4, 1972* R32 Fort Lauderdale Pro WTA 250 Clay
Lesley Hunt 11-9 6-1 Marcie Louie Match data Oct 4, 1969* R16 Berkeley WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lesley Hunt — — — 1,949 306 244 55.6% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Marcie Louie — — — 1,865 103 141 42.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lesley Hunt Marcie Louie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,491 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1969 4–1 80.0% — 1,545 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,564 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1971 4–3 57.1% — 1,593 0 3
18 1968 23–18 56.1% — 1,595 0 1 1972 19–20 48.7% — 1,699 0 3
19 1969 32–21 60.4% — 1,731 0 2 1973 7–20 25.9% — 1,626 0 3
20 1970 45–20 69.2% — 1,920 0 6 1974 11–17 39.3% — 1,684 0 3
21 1971 35–27 56.5% — 1,833 0 7 1975 16–15 51.6% — 1,784 0 4
22 1972 42–27 60.9% — 1,906 0 8 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,787 0 4
23 1973 22–25 46.8% — 1,871 0 8 1977 11–22 33.3% — 1,649 0 4
24 1974 26–17 60.5% — 1,931 0 9 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,601 0 4
25 1975 13–16 44.8% — 1,875 0 9 1979 2–5 28.6% — 1,609 0 4
26 1976 26–22 54.2% — 1,848 0 9 1980 10–10 50.0% — 1,609 0 4
27 1977 10–13 43.5% — 1,782 0 10 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,609 0 4
28 1978 30–30 50.0% — 1,828 0 10 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,576 0 4
29 1979 2–8 20.0% — 1,764 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lesley Hunt Marcie Louie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 2 0 2 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1968 — — — — 15 11 26 57.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1972 1 4 5 20.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
20 1970 10 4 14 71.4% 16 4 20 80.0% 19 12 31 61.3% — — — — 1974 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1971 7 4 11 63.6% 12 11 23 52.2% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
22 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 11 9 20 55.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
23 1973 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5%
24 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 8 17 52.9% 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1977 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1981 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1978 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 6 10 16 37.5% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 54 40 94 57.4% 97 76 173 56.1% 112 76 188 59.6% 43 52 95 45.3% — 28 41 69 40.6% 32 35 67 47.8% 13 18 31 41.9% 26 44 70 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lesley Hunt Marcie Louie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1492 100.8 — — — — +9 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.04
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1545 108.9 — — — — +74 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 — — +0.89
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1565 106.0 — — — — +51 — — 46.2% +0.08 1–0 1–1 — +0.63
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1593 107.1 — — — — — — -48 50.0% -0.42 — — — +1.18
18 1968 1596 113.5 — — — — — -6 -6 53.1% +0.37 10–6 (63%) — — +0.86 1972 1699 128.6 — — — — -98 -107 +10 47.1% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 103.2 -3.23
19 1969 1732 122.8 — — — — -21 -73 -38 57.6% +0.31 8–6 (57%) — — -0.87 1973 1627 126.7 — — — — -36 -91 — 24.6% -1.54 3–2 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 100.9 -3.41
20 1970 1921 143.0 — — — — -94 -42 -67 66.7% +1.30 7–6 (54%) 0–1 — -2.98 1974 1684 131.0 — — — — -38 -120 — 40.0% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 105.8 -1.83
21 1971 1833 139.1 — — — — +31 -38 +13 56.7% +0.48 7–10 (41%) 7–1 (88%) 100.1 -0.26 1975 1784 141.4 — — — — -69 -51 — 49.3% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -1.61
22 1972 1906 147.2 — — — — +108 -126 -9 60.0% +0.86 10–6 (63%) 1–1 — -7.27 1976 1788 133.0 — — — — -63 -23 -148 45.2% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 2–7 (22%) 101.6 -2.81
23 1973 1871 154.6 — — — — +43 -156 +78 51.9% +0.24 2–10 (17%) 6–8 (43%) 90.2 -5.71 1977 1649 127.8 — — — — +26 +9 — 35.1% -1.01 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 -0.50
24 1974 1932 150.2 — — — — -12 -224 +81 57.6% +0.57 8–7 (53%) 5–7 (42%) 100.2 -5.02 1978 1602 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.67
25 1975 1875 148.5 — — — — 0 -153 +98 46.0% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 -4.68 1979 1610 120.6 — — — — +45 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 — — -0.60
26 1976 1848 147.0 — — — — +4 -51 +125 55.9% +0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.3 -4.87 1980 1609 110.6 — — — — +2 +54 — 47.7% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.67
27 1977 1783 132.1 — — — — — -4 +124 43.6% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -1.93 1981 1609 104.8 — — — — +37 — — 36.4% -1.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.25
28 1978 1828 138.3 — — — — -18 -111 +85 48.9% -0.10 11–6 (65%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 -3.81 1982 1576 93.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12
29 1979 1765 115.9 — — — — -38 — — 20.0% -2.20 — — — -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1950 146.0 — — — — +8 -66 +19 55.1% +0.39 75–71 (51%) 31–32 (49%) 99.7 -6.89 — 1866 133.0 — — — — -23 -46 -24 41.3% -0.61 36–23 (61%) 22–23 (49%) 108.5 -3.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.