H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Michelle Tyler H2H: 1-1
Lesley Hunt and Michelle Tyler are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michelle Tyler leads 1–0 on grass, while Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1978 Toronto fourth round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1978 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 7-6 6-1 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1978* | Chichester | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Michelle Tyler | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Michelle Tyler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |