H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Mona Guerrant H2H: 3-2
Lesley Hunt holds a 3–2 lead over Mona Guerrant in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Lesley Hunt leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1973 Columbus fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1973* | Columbus | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lesley Hunt | 6-4 6-4 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1973* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 7-6(2) 6-1 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1973* | Denver | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mona Guerrant | 6-3 6-4 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Jul 1, 1973* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-2 6-3 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1971* | Louisville | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mona Guerrant | 0-6 6-3 7-5 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Mona Guerrant | — | — | — | 1,939 | 123 | 117 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Mona Guerrant | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,886 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |