H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Patricia Walkden H2H: 2-2
Lesley Hunt and Patricia Walkden are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Patricia Walkden leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patricia Walkden won the 1972 Dublin semifinal 4-6 8-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1972* | Dublin | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Patricia Walkden | 4-6 8-6 7-5 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1971* | Durban | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 7-6(7) 2-6 6-4 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1970* | Pensacola | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Lesley Hunt | 6-2 7-5 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1969* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Patricia Walkden | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Patricia Walkden | — | — | — | 1,941 | 218 | 104 | 67.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Patricia Walkden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1968 | 48–23 | 67.6% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1969 | 53–18 | 74.6% | — | 1,879 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1970 | 49–24 | 67.1% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1971 | 9–3 | 75.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 31–17 | 64.6% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 12 |