H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Patti Hogan H2H: 3-2
Lesley Hunt holds a 3–2 lead over Patti Hogan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lesley Hunt leads 3–1 on grass, while Patti Hogan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1976 Eastbourne second round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1976* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-0 6-4 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1971* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Patti Hogan | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1971* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 6-4 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1970* | South Orange | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-4 6-2 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1969* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-2 6-3 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Patti Hogan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 |