H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 1-4
Regina Marsikova holds a 4–1 lead over Lesley Hunt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Regina Marsikova leads 2–0 on clay, while Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1978 Mahwah quarterfinal 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1978* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Regina Marsikova | 6-2 7-6 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1978* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Regina Marsikova | 9-8 4-6 6-3 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1977* | Charlotte | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Regina Marsikova | 6-2 6-3 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1977 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Regina Marsikova | 6-4 6-3 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1976* | Landover | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 7-6(3) | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Regina Marsikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 |