H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 0-1
Renata Tomanova holds a 1–0 lead over Lesley Hunt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1979 Dallas second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1979* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Renata Tomanova | 6-4 6-2 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |