H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Sabina Simmonds H2H: 2-0
Lesley Hunt holds a 2–0 lead over Sabina Simmonds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1978 Sydney fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1978* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-1 6-4 | Sabina Simmonds | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1977* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Sabina Simmonds | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Sabina Simmonds | — | — | — | 1,830 | 108 | 122 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Sabina Simmonds | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |