H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Sue Barker H2H: 1-1
Lesley Hunt and Sue Barker are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1978 Minneapolis third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1978* | Minneapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-4 6-2 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Dec 26, 1973 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 7-5 6-2 | Sue Barker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |