H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesley Hunt vs Valerie Ziegenfuss H2H: 2-2
Lesley Hunt and Valerie Ziegenfuss are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1976 Sarasota third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1976* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Lesley Hunt | 7-5 6-4 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Jan 27, 1973* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-3 7-6 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1972 | Denver | WTA 250 | BR | Hard | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-3 6-4 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1971* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 6-4 6-0 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Hunt | Valerie Ziegenfuss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |