H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lesley Turner vs Evonne Goolagong H2H: 2-1
Lesley Turner holds a 2–1 lead over Evonne Goolagong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lesley Turner leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1976 Australian Open quarterfinal 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 83
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 1975 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Evonne Goolagong | 6-1 7-6 | Lesley Turner | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1969* | Hobart | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Lesley Turner | 6-3 6-2 | Evonne Goolagong | Match data |
| Dec 12, 1968* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Lesley Turner | 7-5 6-2 | Evonne Goolagong | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Turner | — | — | — | 1,912 | 144 | 76 | 65.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Evonne Goolagong | #85 | #35 | — | 2,471 | 735 | 158 | 82.3% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 66 | 84 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Turner | Evonne Goolagong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 74–19 | 79.6% | — | 1,999 | 0 | 13 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 96–16 | 85.7% | — | 2,174 | 2 | 26 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 89–10 | 89.9% | — | 2,238 | 2 | 38 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 102–14 | 87.9% | — | 2,297 | 2 | 50 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 64–11 | 85.3% | — | 2,326 | 3 | 58 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 2,265 | 4 | 62 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,425 | 5 | 69 |
| 25 | 1968 | 48–22 | 68.6% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 20–1 | 95.2% | — | 2,435 | 6 | 73 |
| 26 | 1969 | 55–22 | 71.4% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 47–9 | 83.9% | — | 2,353 | 6 | 79 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 53–11 | 82.8% | — | 2,314 | 6 | 83 |
| 28 | 1971 | 20–12 | 62.5% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 38–19 | 66.7% | — | 2,165 | 7 | 84 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 2,144 | 7 | 84 |
| 30 | 1973 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 2,052 | 7 | 84 |
| 31 | 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,943 | 7 | 84 |
| 32 | 1975 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,914 | 7 | 84 |
| 34 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |