H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lesley Turner vs Lesley Hunt H2H: 3-2
Lesley Turner holds a 3–2 lead over Lesley Hunt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on grass, while Lesley Turner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1978 Eastbourne second round 6-2 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1978* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Lesley Turner | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1971* | Ulster | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Lesley Turner | 0-6 6-4 8-6 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| May 1, 1969* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lesley Turner | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1969* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | (w/o) | Lesley Turner | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1969* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Lesley Turner | 6-2 4-6 8-6 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Turner | — | — | — | 1,912 | 144 | 76 | 65.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Turner | Lesley Hunt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1968 | 48–22 | 68.6% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1969 | 55–22 | 71.4% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1971 | 20–12 | 62.5% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1973 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |