H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lesley Turner vs Linda Tuero H2H: 1-2
Linda Tuero holds a 2–1 lead over Lesley Turner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Linda Tuero leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Tuero won the 1969 Indianapolis semifinal 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1969* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Linda Tuero | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Lesley Turner | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1969* | Houston | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lesley Turner | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1969* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Linda Tuero | 6-4 6-2 | Lesley Turner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Turner | — | — | — | 1,912 | 144 | 76 | 65.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Turner | Linda Tuero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1968 | 48–22 | 68.6% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1969 | 55–22 | 71.4% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1971 | 20–12 | 62.5% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 1973 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |