Lesley Turner
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | 1 | 6 | 7 | Dec 10, 1976 | H2H |
| Virginia Wade | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jun 30, 1978 | H2H |
| Lesley Hunt | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jun 21, 1978 | H2H |
| Karen Krantzcke | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jan 6, 1973 | H2H |
| Winnie Shaw | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 30, 1971 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Lesley Turner vs Mary Ann Eisel H2H: 1-3
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–1 lead over Lesley Turner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1971 Bournemouth round of 16 6-3 9-8(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
3
4 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | 6-3 9-8(4) | Lesley Turner | Match data | May 21, 1971* | R16 | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Mary Ann Eisel | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Lesley Turner | Match data | May 13, 1971* | R32 | Fulham | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Mary Ann Eisel | 6-2 6-3 | Lesley Turner | Match data | Aug 20, 1969* | R16 | Chestnut Hill | WTA 250 | Grass |
| Lesley Turner | 8-10 6-4 6-2 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data | Jun 29, 1969* | R32 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Turner | — | — | — | 1,915 | 144 | 76 | 65.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,956 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Turner | Mary Ann Eisel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1968 | 48–22 | 68.6% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1969 | 55–22 | 71.4% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1971 | 20–12 | 62.5% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1973 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lesley Turner | Mary Ann Eisel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 27 | 9 | 36 | 75.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 26 | 7 | 33 | 78.8% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
| 25 | 1968 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 29 | 11 | 40 | 72.5% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1972 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 26 | 1969 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 33 | 10 | 43 | 76.7% | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | — | — | — | — | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 28 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 71 | 27 | 98 | 72.4% | 61 | 41 | 102 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 46 | 24 | 70 | 65.7% | 75 | 29 | 104 | 72.1% | 34 | 28 | 62 | 54.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lesley Turner | Mary Ann Eisel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1773 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -244 | +92 | 60.9% | +0.93 | 17–7 (71%) | — | — | -1.99 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1820 | 139.1 | — | — | — | — | -21 | -61 | +133 | 65.7% | +1.05 | 15–9 (63%) | — | — | -5.01 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1785 | 131.6 | — | — | — | — | +107 | -54 | +100 | 60.3% | +0.69 | 10–8 (56%) | 1–0 | — | -1.37 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1871 | 144.6 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -38 | +3 | 55.4% | +0.21 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–6 (45%) | 100.6 | -4.54 |
| 25 | 1968 | 1725 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -230 | +73 | -8 | 66.0% | +1.53 | 6–3 (67%) | — | — | +1.24 | 1972 | 1833 | 126.1 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | -11 | 45.8% | -0.04 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–1 | — | -1.40 |
| 26 | 1969 | 1876 | 143.4 | — | — | — | — | -347 | +93 | -23 | 67.5% | +1.42 | 14–6 (70%) | — | — | -4.28 | 1973 | 1844 | 115.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | 66.7% | +1.33 | — | — | — | -0.50 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1865 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | -56 | +61 | — | 76.2% | +1.67 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.04 |
| 28 | 1971 | 1894 | 141.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +19 | +17 | 62.9% | +1.13 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -0.90 | 1975 | 1857 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.07 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1845 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.12 |
| 30 | 1973 | 1878 | 119.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -23 | 60.0% | +0.85 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 1848 | 115.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -23 | 50.0% | -0.19 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 1829 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | -29 | 62.5% | +1.00 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 1815 | 130.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 1786 | 116.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +3 | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 1786 | 126.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +121 | — | 45.5% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1916 | 142.5 | — | — | — | — | -282 | +77 | -8 | 63.8% | +1.20 | 26–21 (55%) | 2–6 (25%) | 99.2 | -2.74 | — | 1956 | 139.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -58 | +93 | 61.0% | +0.78 | 53–39 (58%) | 8–9 (47%) | 103.3 | -5.67 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Mary Ann Eisel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billie Jean King | 0 | 8 | 8 | May 8, 1972 | H2H |
| Judy Tegart | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 2, 1971 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 1 | 6 | 7 | Aug 29, 1971 | H2H |
| Patti Hogan | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 30, 1970 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 15, 1973 | H2H |