H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lesley Turner vs Valerie Ziegenfuss H2H: 2-2
Lesley Turner and Valerie Ziegenfuss are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lesley Turner leads 2–0 on clay, while Valerie Ziegenfuss leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Valerie Ziegenfuss won the 1969 Orange third round 6-4 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1969* | Orange | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-4 3-2 (ret.) | Lesley Turner | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1969* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Lesley Turner | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1969* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lesley Turner | 6-1 6-2 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1968* | Caracas | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 4-6 6-4 8-6 | Lesley Turner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Turner | — | — | — | 1,912 | 144 | 76 | 65.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Turner | Valerie Ziegenfuss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1968 | 48–22 | 68.6% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1969 | 55–22 | 71.4% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1971 | 20–12 | 62.5% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1973 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |