H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lesley Turner vs Winnie Shaw H2H: 2-3
Winnie Shaw holds a 3–2 lead over Lesley Turner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 3–1 on grass, while Lesley Turner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1971 Wimbledon fourth round 1-6 9-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 1-6 9-7 6-3 | Lesley Turner | Match data |
| May 29, 1971* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Lesley Turner | 6-1 6-2 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1971* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-0 1-6 6-4 | Lesley Turner | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1971* | Auckland Centennial | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-3 7-6 | Lesley Turner | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1969* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lesley Turner | 6-3 7-5 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesley Turner | — | — | — | 1,912 | 144 | 76 | 65.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lesley Turner | Winnie Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1968 | 48–22 | 68.6% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1969 | 55–22 | 71.4% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1971 | 20–12 | 62.5% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1973 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 1975 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 1976 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |