H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lilia Osterloh vs Alexandra Stevenson H2H: 1-1

Lilia Osterloh and Alexandra Stevenson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alexandra Stevenson leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexandra Stevenson won the 2001 Quebec City round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Alexandra Stevenson
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alexandra Stevenson #111 6-4 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #59 Match data Sep 21, 2001* R16 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Lilia Osterloh #94 6-2 6-1 Alexandra Stevenson #39 Match data May 26, 2000* R16 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alexandra Stevenson #805 #18 1,444 1,844 86 128 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lilia Osterloh Alexandra Stevenson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #371 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–2 0.0% #394 1,475 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 3–7 30.0% #132 1,477 0 0
18 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0 1999 13–11 54.2% #45 1,673 0 0
19 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0 2000 9–24 27.3% #92 1,520 0 0
20 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0 2001 15–15 50.0% #60 1,672 0 0
21 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0 2002 31–24 56.4% #18 1,835 0 0
22 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0 2003 13–26 33.3% #81 1,609 0 0
23 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0 2004 0–7 0.0% #287 1,514 0 0
24 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #643 1,507 0 0
25 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0 2006 0–4 0.0% #398 1,463 0 0
26 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #211 1,475 0 0
28 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #218 1,447 0 0
29 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #269 1,441 0 0
31 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lilia Osterloh Alexandra Stevenson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 4 11 15 26.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
20 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 23 16 39 59.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
22 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3% — 48 75 123 39.0% 7 21 28 25.0% 15 14 29 51.7% 16 18 34 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's and 16/58 of Alexandra Stevenson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lilia Osterloh Alexandra Stevenson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/39 10.0 5.7 63.6% 66.8% 40.3% 71.7% 36.1% 56.9% 31.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/7 2.5 6.5 57.2% 64.5% 40.5% 31.3% 6.3% 53.7% 32.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 2.5 3.0 56.8% 56.9% 40.8% 55.2% 40.0% 50.1% 28.4%
27 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3% 2008 2/2 2.0 2.0 65.3% 65.1% 32.1% 50.0% 54.2% 54.4% 42.0%
28 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1% 2009 2/2 3.5 6.0 56.0% 64.4% 41.2% 64.2% 28.3% 53.0% 35.5%
29 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9% 2011 3/4 3.3 5.0 48.3% 53.5% 43.3% 51.5% 51.4% 48.2% 46.6%
31 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1% — 16/214 4.1 4.6 57.5% 61.0% 40.1% 55.1% 37.5% 52.4% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lilia Osterloh Alexandra Stevenson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1497 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1475 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.30
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1478 103.0 — — — — +11 — — 36.4% -1.05 0–2 0–1 — +0.97
18 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06 1999 1674 132.4 — — — — -104 — +100 49.1% -0.36 8–1 (89%) 5–1 (83%) 112.3 -1.46
19 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04 2000 1521 121.1 — — — — +12 -47 +192 32.9% -1.27 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.1 +0.34
20 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07 2001 1673 133.8 — — — — -28 -210 +89 53.1% +0.08 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -1.23
21 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06 2002 1836 146.6 — — — — +21 -391 -146 53.7% +0.15 14–10 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 109.1 +0.07
22 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05 2003 1610 118.0 +0.40 -2.78 0.731 44.9% +56 -204 +23 38.1% -0.79 4–8 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 94.0 +2.32
23 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27 2004 1514 94.8 -0.12 -2.43 0.700 42.9% +34 — — 17.6% -2.30 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.16
24 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31 2005 1507 101.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.06
25 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04 2006 1464 99.6 -2.52 -4.98 0.569 40.6% +19 — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.13
26 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 2008 1476 106.2 +1.20 +0.54 0.922 47.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22
28 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94 2009 1448 97.2 -2.56 -1.28 0.756 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.14
29 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06 2011 1441 97.3 -2.94 -0.45 0.899 47.3% — — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.07
31 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1430 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1416 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89 — 1845 131.9 -1.29 -2.25 0.745 44.3% +9 -164 +56 42.6% -0.60 33–35 (49%) 34–26 (57%) 106.1 +0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.