Lilia Osterloh
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | 3 | 3 | 6 | Nov 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 22, 2004 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 16, 2008 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 16, 2008 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 10, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Lilia Osterloh vs Amanda Hopmans H2H: 1-0
Lilia Osterloh holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Hopmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2001 ASB Classic round of 16 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lilia Osterloh | 6-2 6-3 | Amanda Hopmans | Match data | Jan 4, 2001* | R16 | ASB Classic | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lilia Osterloh | #1,223 | #41 | 738 | 1,696 | 83 | 138 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amanda Hopmans | #978 | #72 | 411 | 1,603 | 23 | 36 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lilia Osterloh | Amanda Hopmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #79 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #43 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #156 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #162 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #119 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #144 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #91 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #230 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #237 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lilia Osterloh | Amanda Hopmans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1999 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2002 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2000 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2003 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 56 | 76 | 132 | 42.4% | 11 | 34 | 45 | 24.4% | 11 | 18 | 29 | 37.9% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lilia Osterloh | Amanda Hopmans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1996 | 1519 | 110.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1551 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 28.6% | -2.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1502 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.85 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 1546 | 126.1 | — | — | — | — | +29 | +17 | +5 | 40.0% | -0.98 | 4–2 (67%) | — | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 1596 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -49 | +61 | 42.5% | -0.41 | 8–6 (57%) | 3–8 (27%) | 101.9 | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 1658 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -132 | +27 | 49.5% | -0.09 | 5–8 (38%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.9 | -0.27 | 1999 | 1549 | 120.0 | — | — | — | — | +66 | -49 | +37 | 40.4% | -0.70 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.1 | -0.43 |
| 24 | 2002 | 1535 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | +102 | -112 | +96 | 29.3% | -1.59 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–3 (40%) | 102.7 | -1.31 | 2000 | 1539 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -22 | +11 | 49.2% | -0.03 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–4 (20%) | 93.0 | +1.81 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1509 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.04 | 2001 | 1518 | 107.4 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -16 | — | 25.0% | -2.00 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.79 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1561 | 130.0 | — | — | — | — | +95 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.38 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1488 | 99.5 | -2.44 | -2.36 | 0.703 | 41.7% | +105 | -60 | — | 28.0% | -2.08 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 1510 | 110.3 | -2.68 | -0.13 | 0.914 | 47.9% | +82 | — | — | 46.9% | -0.19 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.8 | +0.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 1545 | 117.7 | -3.39 | +0.08 | 0.882 | 46.8% | +27 | — | — | 41.9% | -0.91 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–0 | — | -0.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 1486 | 100.1 | -3.07 | -1.01 | 0.871 | 46.7% | +64 | -97 | — | 24.0% | -1.44 | 1–0 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 1511 | 100.3 | -0.43 | -1.46 | 0.901 | 48.5% | +43 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 3–0 (100%) | 0–1 | — | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1468 | 100.5 | -2.57 | -3.96 | 0.740 | 43.5% | +60 | — | — | 18.8% | -2.19 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1696 | 123.9 | -2.71 | -1.06 | 0.855 | 46.4% | +34 | -80 | +48 | 39.2% | -0.82 | 33–35 (49%) | 16–27 (37%) | 99.8 | -0.89 | — | 1604 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +47 | -30 | +24 | 42.1% | -0.59 | 5–9 (36%) | 2–7 (22%) | 91.2 | +1.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Amanda Hopmans
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Capriati | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 29, 2001 | H2H |
| Cristina Torrens Valero | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 3, 2001 | H2H |
| Miroslava Vavrinec | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jun 14, 2000 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 14, 2000 | H2H |
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 2 | 0 | 2 | May 12, 2000 | H2H |