Lilia Osterloh
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | 3 | 3 | 6 | Nov 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 22, 2004 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 16, 2008 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 16, 2008 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 10, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Mariana Diaz-Oliva holds a 1–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariana Diaz-Oliva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mariana Diaz-Oliva won the 2006 Los Angeles round of 64 7-6(4) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | Lilia Osterloh | Match data | Aug 9, 2006* | R64 | Los Angeles | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lilia Osterloh | #1,223 | #41 | 738 | 1,696 | 83 | 138 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,652 | 86 | 130 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lilia Osterloh | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #79 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #43 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #156 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #119 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #144 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2006 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2007 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #91 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #230 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2009 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #237 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lilia Osterloh | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1998 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1999 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2007 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2005 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 56 | 76 | 132 | 42.4% | 11 | 34 | 45 | 24.4% | 11 | 18 | 29 | 37.9% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | 24 | 52 | 76 | 31.6% | 58 | 68 | 126 | 46.0% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's and 22/85 of Mariana Diaz-Oliva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Lilia Osterloh | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 27 | 2005 | 3/11 | 0.3 | 4.3 | 60.5% | 46.3% | 46.2% | 38.9% | 66.7% | 46.9% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2006 | 7/14 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 66.1% | 56.0% | 39.1% | 42.7% | 47.9% | 49.6% | 46.1% | 2004 | 3/15 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 69.2% | 52.5% | 43.8% | 53.5% | 45.2% | 49.9% | 42.9% |
| 29 | 2007 | 17/19 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 60.1% | 54.8% | 45.0% | 46.6% | 44.5% | 50.6% | 43.6% | 2005 | 6/45 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 63.2% | 57.4% | 42.2% | 56.9% | 54.7% | 51.7% | 47.7% |
| 30 | 2008 | 12/13 | 1.3 | 4.6 | 58.3% | 60.2% | 37.4% | 55.9% | 42.2% | 50.7% | 42.9% | 2006 | 13/25 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 66.1% | 55.4% | 37.1% | 55.1% | 46.9% | 49.0% | 44.1% |
| 31 | 2009 | 6/6 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 62.8% | 60.1% | 48.3% | 55.1% | 59.7% | 56.1% | 39.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 7/7 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 61.3% | 57.0% | 39.1% | 47.3% | 54.5% | 50.0% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 52/221 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 61.0% | 56.6% | 42.1% | 48.9% | 48.8% | 50.8% | 42.1% | — | 22/216 | 1.0 | 3.9 | 65.8% | 55.5% | 39.4% | 55.4% | 48.8% | 49.9% | 44.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lilia Osterloh | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1996 | 1519 | 110.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1551 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 28.6% | -2.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1502 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.85 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.07 | 1996 | 1486 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 |
| 21 | 1999 | 1546 | 126.1 | — | — | — | — | +29 | +17 | +5 | 40.0% | -0.98 | 4–2 (67%) | — | — | -0.06 | 1997 | 1456 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | 25.0% | -1.38 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.10 |
| 22 | 2000 | 1596 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -49 | +61 | 42.5% | -0.41 | 8–6 (57%) | 3–8 (27%) | 101.9 | -0.05 | 1998 | 1471 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +58 | — | 43.3% | -0.47 | 1–1 | 3–3 (50%) | — | +1.39 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1658 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -132 | +27 | 49.5% | -0.09 | 5–8 (38%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.9 | -0.27 | 1999 | 1511 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | 41.3% | -0.44 | 5–1 (83%) | 3–2 (60%) | 105.7 | +1.34 |
| 24 | 2002 | 1535 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | +102 | -112 | +96 | 29.3% | -1.59 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–3 (40%) | 102.7 | -1.31 | 2000 | 1500 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | -35 | +12 | — | 33.3% | -0.89 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.0 | +0.33 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1509 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.04 | 2001 | 1548 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -74 | +72 | — | 42.7% | -0.76 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–1 (80%) | 108.0 | -0.32 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1561 | 130.0 | — | — | — | — | +95 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.38 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.58 | 2002 | 1568 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | -86 | +51 | — | 46.4% | -0.36 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 95.3 | -0.04 |
| 27 | 2005 | 1488 | 99.5 | -2.44 | -2.36 | 0.703 | 41.7% | +105 | -60 | — | 28.0% | -2.08 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.27 | 2003 | 1581 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +98 | — | 37.5% | -0.06 | 2–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.45 |
| 28 | 2006 | 1510 | 110.3 | -2.68 | -0.13 | 0.914 | 47.9% | +82 | — | — | 46.9% | -0.19 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.8 | +0.94 | 2004 | 1540 | 108.8 | -1.83 | -0.74 | 0.856 | 46.7% | -69 | +94 | — | 32.4% | -1.12 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.8 | -0.24 |
| 29 | 2007 | 1545 | 117.7 | -3.39 | +0.08 | 0.882 | 46.8% | +27 | — | — | 41.9% | -0.91 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–0 | — | -0.55 | 2005 | 1606 | 122.7 | -1.27 | +1.04 | 0.989 | 50.0% | -69 | +54 | -120 | 48.4% | -0.26 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–6 (50%) | 106.4 | -0.48 |
| 30 | 2008 | 1486 | 100.1 | -3.07 | -1.01 | 0.871 | 46.7% | +64 | -97 | — | 24.0% | -1.44 | 1–0 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.06 | 2006 | 1460 | 104.0 | -4.32 | -0.65 | 0.866 | 46.5% | +14 | +88 | — | 28.8% | -1.46 | 2–9 (18%) | 2–5 (29%) | 90.3 | 0.00 |
| 31 | 2009 | 1511 | 100.3 | -0.43 | -1.46 | 0.901 | 48.5% | +43 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 3–0 (100%) | 0–1 | — | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 1468 | 100.5 | -2.57 | -3.96 | 0.740 | 43.5% | +60 | — | — | 18.8% | -2.19 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1696 | 123.9 | -2.71 | -1.06 | 0.855 | 46.4% | +34 | -80 | +48 | 39.2% | -0.82 | 33–35 (49%) | 16–27 (37%) | 99.8 | -0.89 | — | 1653 | 112.9 | -3.15 | -0.20 | 0.897 | 47.5% | -53 | +56 | -120 | 40.3% | -0.68 | 31–30 (51%) | 25–31 (45%) | 100.1 | +1.21 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Craybas | 3 | 3 | 6 | Nov 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jul 22, 2004 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 16, 2008 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 16, 2008 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 10, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paola Suarez | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 27, 2003 | H2H |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 12, 2006 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 2006 | H2H |
| Anne Kremer | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 5, 2005 | H2H |
| Fabiola Zuluaga | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 18, 2005 | H2H |