H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lilia Osterloh vs Meilen Tu H2H: 1-2

Meilen Tu holds a 2–1 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2006 Birmingham third round 6-0 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 2006* Birmingham WTA 500 R32 Grass Meilen Tu #135 6-0 7-6(6) Lilia Osterloh #111 Match data
Jun 27, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lilia Osterloh #51 6-4 7-5 Meilen Tu #36 Match data
Jan 5, 2001* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Meilen Tu #67 2-6 7-6(1) 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lilia Osterloh Meilen Tu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0
18 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0
19 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,519 0 0
20 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0
21 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,485 0 0
22 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0
23 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1
24 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1
26 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1
27 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,474 0 1
28 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1
29 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,625 0 1
30 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,546 0 1
31 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —