H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lilia Osterloh vs Meilen Tu H2H: 1-2

Meilen Tu holds a 2–1 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2006 Birmingham round of 32 6-0 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meilen Tu #135 6-0 7-6(6) Lilia Osterloh #111 Match data Jun 15, 2006* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Lilia Osterloh #51 6-4 7-5 Meilen Tu #36 Match data Jun 27, 2001* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Meilen Tu #67 2-6 7-6(1) 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #43 Match data Jan 5, 2001* QF ASB Classic Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lilia Osterloh Meilen Tu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0
18 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0
19 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,520 0 0
20 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0
21 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,484 0 0
22 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0
23 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1
24 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1
26 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1
27 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,473 0 1
28 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1
29 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,626 0 1
30 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,548 0 1
31 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lilia Osterloh Meilen Tu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 7 13 20 35.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3% — 60 96 156 38.5% 18 37 55 32.7% 17 17 34 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's and 58/96 of Meilen Tu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lilia Osterloh Meilen Tu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/18 0.0 7.0 63.2% 53.5% 44.0% 36.4% 28.6% 50.0% 48.9%
27 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3% 2005 3/13 1.0 3.0 65.7% 52.1% 48.2% 55.9% 41.7% 50.6% 36.4%
28 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1% 2006 12/16 0.6 4.2 64.7% 58.3% 44.3% 43.8% 43.2% 53.3% 41.8%
29 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6% 2007 38/42 1.0 5.3 65.8% 62.7% 42.6% 55.8% 49.7% 55.8% 45.5%
30 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9% 2008 4/7 0.5 4.3 71.0% 55.8% 43.7% 52.5% 59.4% 52.2% 39.9%
31 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1% — 58/266 0.9 4.9 65.9% 60.6% 43.3% 52.8% 48.2% 54.7% 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lilia Osterloh Meilen Tu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1543 126.0 — — — — +32 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 1–0 — -0.21
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1506 118.5 — — — — +10 — +85 33.3% -0.47 0–6 (0%) 0–5 (0%) 91.1 -0.04
18 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06 1996 1518 108.5 — — — — +9 — — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — +0.25
19 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04 1997 1520 114.3 — — — — +34 — — 37.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 2–0 — -0.01
20 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07 1998 1533 111.4 — — — — +25 — — 46.2% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.08
21 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06 1999 1485 108.0 — — — — +29 -18 — 28.1% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.21
22 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05 2000 1576 129.8 — — — — -11 -88 — 35.5% -0.87 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -1.26
23 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27 2001 1615 124.8 — — — — +19 -100 -43 50.4% +0.09 15–12 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 98.8 +2.97
24 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31 2002 1562 120.2 — — — — +9 -52 +23 41.5% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 8–3 (73%) 98.2 +0.86
25 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04 2003 1478 102.5 -0.75 +0.07 0.979 49.4% +37 -53 — 27.9% -1.28 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08
26 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58 2004 1464 95.0 — — — — +44 — — 30.8% -1.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.51
27 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 2005 1473 93.5 -1.15 -2.22 0.738 43.7% +25 — +71 35.7% -1.64 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 -0.07
28 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94 2006 1532 114.0 -1.42 -1.20 0.896 47.6% -68 — +139 44.4% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 103.6 +0.38
29 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55 2007 1627 128.6 +0.38 +1.07 1.029 50.8% -79 -65 +74 48.4% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) 104.1 -0.11
30 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06 2008 1548 100.4 -1.42 -2.70 0.835 46.2% -63 — — 23.5% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20
31 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89 — 1693 123.2 -0.22 +0.15 0.969 49.4% 0 -69 +60 40.9% -0.65 40–51 (44%) 34–31 (52%) 102.6 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.