H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lilia Osterloh vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 2-0

Lilia Osterloh holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cacic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2001 Stanford round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cacic
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lilia Osterloh #56 6-2 6-3 Sandra Cacic #89 Match data Jul 27, 2001* R16 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lilia Osterloh #51 6-3 6-2 Sandra Cacic #129 Match data Feb 23, 2001* R16 Oklahoma City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cacic #409 #39 548 1,730 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lilia Osterloh Sandra Cacic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #310 1,481 0 0
18 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0 1993 4–6 40.0% #76 1,533 0 0
19 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0 1994 12–16 42.9% #54 1,617 0 0
20 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0 1995 7–12 36.8% #114 1,602 0 0
21 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0 1996 9–12 42.9% #78 1,569 0 1
22 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0 1997 7–11 38.9% #60 1,581 0 1
23 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0 1998 7–16 30.4% #82 1,556 0 1
24 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0 1999 2–7 22.2% #188 1,509 0 1
25 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #140 1,505 0 1
26 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0 2001 9–11 45.0% #117 1,577 0 1
27 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #322 1,565 0 1
28 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #395 1,548 0 1
29 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lilia Osterloh Sandra Cacic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3% — 38 48 86 44.2% 10 31 41 24.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lilia Osterloh Sandra Cacic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1482 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22
18 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06 1993 1534 121.2 — — — — +55 — — 36.0% -0.92 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — -0.02
19 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04 1994 1617 134.8 — — — — +7 -51 — 43.9% -0.56 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.15
20 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07 1995 1602 122.7 — — — — +22 -68 — 40.9% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.03
21 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06 1996 1569 120.7 — — — — +101 -123 — 43.5% -0.54 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.01
22 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05 1997 1582 124.7 — — — — +81 — +18 43.6% -0.62 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 -0.41
23 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27 1998 1556 129.8 — — — — +49 -109 — 35.2% -1.04 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -0.12
24 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31 1999 1509 93.4 — — — — +60 -82 — 23.5% -2.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
25 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04 2000 1505 103.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.19
26 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58 2001 1578 126.4 — — — — +38 -178 — 41.3% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.74
27 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 2002 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02
28 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94 2003 1548 101.1 — — — — +35 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–2 — +0.14
29 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89 — 1731 130.9 — — — — +50 -93 +18 39.1% -0.75 23–23 (50%) 14–17 (45%) 102.9 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.