H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lina Krasnoroutskaya vs Els Callens H2H: 1-1
Lina Krasnoroutskaya and Els Callens are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Els Callens leads 1–0 on carpet, while Lina Krasnoroutskaya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2004 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2004* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Els Callens | 6-3 6-4 | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | Match data |
| May 14, 2003* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | 6-4 6-4 | Els Callens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lina Krasnoroutskaya | #424 | #25 | 1,173 | 1,807 | 65 | 70 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | Els Callens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1999 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2001 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #34 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #28 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #141 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #424 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |