H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Linda Cassell vs Marie Pinterova H2H: 0-2
Marie Pinterova holds a 2–0 lead over Linda Cassell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marie Pinterova leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Marie Pinterova won the 1980 Sydney third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 64
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 1980* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Marie Pinterova | 6-4 6-1 | Linda Cassell | Match data |
| Nov 21, 1980* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Marie Pinterova | 6-2 6-1 | Linda Cassell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Cassell | — | — | — | 1,567 | 10 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Cassell | Marie Pinterova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1978 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 |