H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Linda Cassell vs Micki Schillig H2H: 0-1

Micki Schillig holds a 1–0 lead over Linda Cassell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Micki Schillig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Micki Schillig won the 1982 Warrensville Heights round of 32 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Linda Cassell
AUS Age 64
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Micki Schillig
USA Age 65

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Micki Schillig 6-0 6-0 Linda Cassell Match data Jul 1, 1982* R32 Warrensville Heights WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Linda Cassell — — — 1,545 10 15 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Micki Schillig — — — 1,650 26 30 46.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Linda Cassell Micki Schillig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1978 2–1 66.7% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1980 4–4 50.0% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1981 3–2 60.0% — 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1982 1–6 14.3% — 1,447 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
21 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,435 0 0 1982 14–6 70.0% — 1,638 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1983 4–5 44.4% — 1,611 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1984 3–9 25.0% — 1,526 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% — 1,520 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1986 0–3 0.0% — 1,473 0 1

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Linda Cassell Micki Schillig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1978 1508 94.4 — — — — — — +63 57.1% -0.86 1–0 1–0 — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1979 1497 99.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 1527 99.2 — — — — — — +19 42.9% -0.64 — 1–0 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1528 98.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 2–0 0–1 — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1448 76.4 — — — — +111 — — 18.8% -3.06 1–1 0–1 — +0.61 1981 1488 100.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.11
21 1983 1436 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.02 1982 1639 122.3 — — — — -31 — — 64.4% +1.11 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.81
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1611 103.8 — — — — +28 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — +1.11
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1527 97.9 — — — — +39 +13 — 32.1% -1.46 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.23
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1520 95.3 — — — — — -20 — 40.0% -0.80 3–0 (100%) — — +0.80
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1474 88.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.58
Career — 1546 87.6 — — — — +111 — +31 34.6% -1.58 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.1 +9.17 — 1651 105.9 — — — — +10 -1 — 44.4% -0.37 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.2 +7.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.