H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Linda Ferrando vs Neige Dias H2H: 1-0

Linda Ferrando holds a 1–0 lead over Neige Dias in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Ferrando leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Ferrando won the 1988 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-0 6-3.

ITA Age 60 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Ferrando #146 6-0 6-3 Neige Dias Match data Mar 15, 1988* R128 Key Biscayne Category 6 modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Linda Ferrando #474 #36 42 1,734 87 101 46.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Neige Dias 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Linda Ferrando Neige Dias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1981 2–3 40.0% 1,493 0 0
15 1982 2–2 50.0% 1,497 0 0
17 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0
18 1985 6–12 33.3% 1,527 0 0
19 1985 2–2 50.0% #221 1,502 0 0 1986 19–19 50.0% 1,610 0 0
20 1987 12–15 44.4% 1,647 0 1
21 1987 3–4 42.9% #154 1,536 0 0 1988 25–13 65.8% 1,712 0 2
22 1988 11–12 47.8% #67 1,553 0 0 1989 9–10 47.4% 1,673 0 2
23 1989 16–15 51.6% #44 1,687 0 0
24 1990 14–17 45.2% #67 1,651 0 0
25 1991 9–12 42.9% #94 1,655 0 0
26 1992 11–13 45.8% #62 1,672 0 0
27 1993 13–13 50.0% #52 1,669 0 0
28 1994 8–12 40.0% #84 1,640 0 0
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #474 1,623 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Linda Ferrando Neige Dias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1985 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0%
22 1988 5 3 8 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
23 1989 7 7 14 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1990 6 6 12 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
29 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 33 37 70 47.1% 48 47 95 50.5% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 9 13 30.8% 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Linda Ferrando Neige Dias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1981 1493 96.1 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 -0.12
15 1982 1497 97.5 +31 50.0% -0.63 +0.58
17 1984 1482 98.6 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.16
18 1985 1528 114.5 +21 +57 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55
19 1985 1502 98.7 +63 50.0% -0.50 +0.57 1986 1611 116.1 +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40
20 1987 1648 123.5 -61 +20 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34
21 1987 1537 114.8 +41 41.2% -0.59 2–1 (67%) -0.36 1988 1712 129.5 -100 +84 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97
22 1988 1554 116.4 +49 +13 50.9% -0.13 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 +1.49 1989 1674 112.9 +55 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66
23 1989 1687 142.3 -24 +1 49.3% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -1.31
24 1990 1652 129.9 -2 +38 47.9% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–5 (50%) 96.5 +0.69
25 1991 1655 121.2 -44 +44 -94 42.6% -0.45 5–2 (71%) 0–2 -1.11
26 1992 1673 130.3 -78 +87 48.0% +0.32 2–2 (50%) 0–1 -0.73
27 1993 1669 123.5 -85 +93 50.8% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.05
28 1994 1641 131.6 +13 +33 38.6% -0.70 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) -1.03
29 1995 1623 97.4 33.3% -3.33 0–1 +0.13
Career 1734 134.4 -21 +47 -94 47.1% -0.10 32–29 (52%) 11–19 (37%) 96.1 -0.86 1749 122.0 -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.