H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Linda Mottram vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 1-0
Linda Mottram holds a 1–0 lead over Sylvia Hanika in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Mottram leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Linda Mottram won the 1976 Bremen semifinal 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1976* | Bremen | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Linda Mottram | 7-6 6-2 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Mottram | — | — | — | 1,867 | 99 | 49 | 66.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Mottram | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 6–1 | 85.7% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 32–8 | 80.0% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1976 | 21–7 | 75.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1978 | 19–7 | 73.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1979 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 |