H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Tuero vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 2-0
Linda Tuero holds a 2–0 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Linda Tuero leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Tuero won the 1968 Cincinnati final 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1968* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Linda Tuero | 6-1 6-2 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1968* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Linda Tuero | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Tuero | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |