H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Linda Wild vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 0-1
Andrea Temesvari holds a 1–0 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1989 US Open first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andrea Temesvari | 6-1 6-4 | Linda Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |