H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Linda Wild vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-1
Linda Wild and Asa Carlsson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay, while Linda Wild leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1994 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1994* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Linda Wild | 6-3 6-0 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| May 13, 1994* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 6-4 6-0 | Linda Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Linda Wild | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |