H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Wild vs Catherine Suire H2H: 1-0
Linda Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Suire in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1992 Eastbourne second round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1992* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Linda Wild | 6-3 7-6 | Catherine Suire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Catherine Suire | #513 | #52 | 13 | 1,692 | 77 | 128 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Catherine Suire | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #84 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #135 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #124 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #139 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #213 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |