H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Wild vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 2-1
Linda Wild holds a 2–1 lead over Gigi Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1995 Eastbourne third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1995* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Gigi Fernandez | 7-5 6-4 | Linda Wild | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1991* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Linda Wild | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1991* | Houston | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Linda Wild | 6-4 6-1 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Gigi Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |