H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Wild vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 0-1
Heather Ludloff holds a 1–0 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1991 Eastbourne second round 1-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1991* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Heather Ludloff | 1-6 6-3 6-3 | Linda Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Heather Ludloff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |