H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Wild vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 1-1
Linda Wild and Helen Kelesi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on clay, while Linda Wild leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1992 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Linda Wild | 6-1 6-4 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
| May 25, 1990* | Geneva | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Helen Kelesi | 6-1 6-4 | Linda Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Helen Kelesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |