H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Linda Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1992 Wimbledon round of 128 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | 6-4 6-2 | Jo Durie | Match data | Jun 24, 1992* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,815 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Jo Durie | #302 | #5 | 31 | 2,101 | 311 | 263 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Linda Wild | Jo Durie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 4 |
| 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 30–14 | 68.2% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 7 |
| 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 7 |
| 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #6 | 2,094 | 0 | 9 |
| 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,625 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #24 | 1,890 | 0 | 9 |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #26 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 |
| 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,540 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #24 | 1,841 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #73 | 1,741 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,702 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #117 | 1,621 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,673 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,688 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #348 | 1,555 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,548 | 0 | 9 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Linda Wild | Jo Durie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1972 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1992 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1993 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 1994 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1981 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1995 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 1982 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1996 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1983 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% |
| 1997 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 70 | 79 | 149 | 47.0% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 19 | 19 | 38 | 50.0% | 27 | 18 | 45 | 60.0% | Career | 73 | 75 | 148 | 49.3% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 103 | 72 | 175 | 58.9% | 50 | 65 | 115 | 43.5% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Linda Wild | Jo Durie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1972 | 1493 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 1975 | 1499 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.55 |
| 1989 | 1457 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.06 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 | 1976 | 1503 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | +73 | — | +94 | 54.2% | +0.71 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +3.14 |
| 1990 | 1555 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -3 | — | 43.2% | -0.52 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.4 | -0.32 | 1977 | 1602 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -35 | +40 | 56.1% | +0.71 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | +2.47 |
| 1991 | 1721 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -71 | -49 | -115 | 50.0% | -0.26 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.4 | -0.67 | 1978 | 1619 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | -9 | 57.4% | +0.50 | 5–1 (83%) | 1–2 (33%) | 104.3 | +2.99 |
| 1992 | 1733 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -75 | +45 | 47.8% | -0.05 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.9 | -1.52 | 1979 | 1714 | 129.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -76 | -94 | 58.5% | +0.36 | 6–1 (86%) | 6–2 (75%) | 110.0 | +0.87 |
| 1993 | 1765 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -174 | -41 | 56.4% | +0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.5 | +0.50 | 1980 | 1734 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | -184 | -10 | -56 | 61.7% | +0.60 | 5–8 (38%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.6 | +0.68 |
| 1994 | 1741 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -164 | +80 | 51.6% | -0.05 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.6 | -1.90 | 1981 | 1859 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | -159 | -77 | -116 | 60.8% | +0.60 | 12–2 (86%) | 4–1 (80%) | 113.5 | -0.98 |
| 1995 | 1758 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -201 | +14 | 58.0% | +0.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.1 | +1.45 | 1982 | 1841 | 141.1 | — | — | — | — | -59 | -75 | -37 | 55.1% | +0.21 | 8–9 (47%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.4 | -2.62 |
| 1996 | 1810 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -227 | -22 | 55.2% | +0.55 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.6 | +0.67 | 1983 | 2095 | 159.8 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -184 | -99 | 69.3% | +1.31 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–2 (60%) | 104.6 | -5.64 |
| 1997 | 1625 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | +96 | -90 | +72 | 25.6% | -2.15 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | +0.19 | 1984 | 1891 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -59 | +84 | 49.3% | +0.53 | 7–4 (64%) | 1–5 (17%) | 95.2 | +0.18 |
| 1999 | 1567 | 91.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.38 | 1985 | 1800 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -48 | +123 | 48.8% | +0.06 | 7–7 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.7 | -1.37 |
| 2000 | 1541 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.42 | 1986 | 1842 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -79 | +45 | 55.7% | +0.21 | 11–6 (65%) | 8–3 (73%) | 105.1 | -3.56 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1741 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -30 | +108 | 41.0% | -0.69 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.3 | -2.72 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1703 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -16 | +119 | 49.4% | -0.10 | 6–5 (55%) | 8–4 (67%) | 101.9 | -0.26 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1622 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -8 | — | +201 | 41.3% | -0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.1 | +0.38 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1674 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -60 | — | +193 | 51.7% | +0.48 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.4 | +0.04 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1709 | 132.3 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -111 | +94 | 45.5% | -0.12 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.5 | +1.02 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1689 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | -48 | -50 | +162 | 50.0% | -0.09 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.1 | +0.39 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1563 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | -11 | — | — | 35.9% | -0.74 | 3–6 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 92.1 | +1.33 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1555 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +191 | 33.3% | -1.42 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.60 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1548 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +141 | 40.0% | -0.60 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.20 |
| Career | 1816 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -98 | +18 | 48.5% | -0.14 | 43–42 (51%) | 31–29 (52%) | 102.2 | -0.65 | Career | 2101 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -67 | +43 | 53.6% | +0.27 | 97–90 (52%) | 53–46 (54%) | 102.6 | -0.68 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 1, 1996 | H2H |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | 5 | 0 | 5 | Feb 17, 1994 | H2H |
| Nicole Bradtke | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 20, 1993 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | 3 | 10 | 13 | Aug 14, 1992 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 8 | 5 | 13 | Jul 21, 1990 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 12 | 12 | Feb 2, 1991 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 2 | 9 | 11 | Aug 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Anne Hobbs | 4 | 5 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |