H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Linda Wild vs Kristin Godridge H2H: 3-0
Linda Wild holds a 3–0 lead over Kristin Godridge in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1995 Beijing semifinal 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
HKG
Age 53
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1995* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Linda Wild | 6-2 6-0 | Kristin Godridge | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1995* | Nagoya | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Linda Wild | 6-0 6-0 | Kristin Godridge | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1993* | Taipei | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Linda Wild | 6-2 6-4 | Kristin Godridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Kristin Godridge | #530 | #79 | 38 | 1,637 | 52 | 75 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Kristin Godridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #120 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #92 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #138 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #195 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #98 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #335 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |