H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Linda Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1992 Eastbourne Open round of 16 3-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data | Jun 19, 1992* | R16 | Eastbourne Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,815 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 240 | 241 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Linda Wild | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #16 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,625 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #58 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,752 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,540 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Linda Wild | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1972 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1985 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 1991 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1986 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 1992 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1987 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 1993 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1988 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 1994 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1989 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 1995 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 1990 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1996 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1991 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% |
| 1997 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | 70 | 79 | 149 | 47.0% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 19 | 19 | 38 | 50.0% | 27 | 18 | 45 | 60.0% | Career | 97 | 102 | 199 | 48.7% | 27 | 47 | 74 | 36.5% | 70 | 46 | 116 | 60.3% | 46 | 46 | 92 | 50.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Linda Wild | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1972 | 1493 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 1983 | 1498 | 109.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.18 |
| 1989 | 1457 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.06 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 | 1984 | 1507 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +100 | +55 | 40.0% | -0.87 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.25 |
| 1990 | 1555 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -3 | — | 43.2% | -0.52 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.4 | -0.32 | 1985 | 1674 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -159 | -3 | 44.2% | -0.31 | 9–6 (60%) | 3–5 (38%) | 104.0 | -0.37 |
| 1991 | 1721 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -71 | -49 | -115 | 50.0% | -0.26 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.4 | -0.67 | 1986 | 1752 | 135.5 | — | — | — | — | -106 | -188 | +58 | 51.2% | -0.16 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.9 | -1.29 |
| 1992 | 1733 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -75 | +45 | 47.8% | -0.05 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.9 | -1.52 | 1987 | 1793 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | -74 | -246 | +115 | 60.8% | +0.61 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–5 (29%) | 102.1 | +1.13 |
| 1993 | 1765 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -174 | -41 | 56.4% | +0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.5 | +0.50 | 1988 | 1870 | 156.5 | — | — | — | — | -44 | — | +85 | 56.9% | +0.37 | 13–8 (62%) | 11–6 (65%) | 107.7 | -2.81 |
| 1994 | 1741 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -164 | +80 | 51.6% | -0.05 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.6 | -1.90 | 1989 | 1862 | 145.0 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -238 | +26 | 60.2% | +0.39 | 5–10 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 94.3 | -0.82 |
| 1995 | 1758 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -201 | +14 | 58.0% | +0.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.1 | +1.45 | 1990 | 1707 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -54 | +235 | 43.7% | -0.39 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.9 | -0.20 |
| 1996 | 1810 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -227 | -22 | 55.2% | +0.55 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.6 | +0.67 | 1991 | 1699 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +18 | -58 | +204 | 53.7% | +0.02 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.3 | +1.48 |
| 1997 | 1625 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | +96 | -90 | +72 | 25.6% | -2.15 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | +0.19 | 1992 | 1721 | 141.5 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -77 | +179 | 49.4% | -0.16 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 96.8 | -1.79 |
| 1999 | 1567 | 91.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.38 | 1993 | 1753 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -113 | +158 | 52.3% | -0.05 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–6 (33%) | 98.9 | -0.11 |
| 2000 | 1541 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.42 | 1994 | 1809 | 144.2 | — | — | — | — | -28 | -170 | +83 | 48.4% | -0.13 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–4 (60%) | 102.0 | -3.68 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1650 | 126.3 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -8 | +193 | 39.1% | -0.65 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–3 (40%) | 99.9 | +0.43 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1668 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | -51 | -53 | +258 | 44.1% | -0.59 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–2 | — | -1.58 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1621 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -24 | +203 | 38.0% | -0.46 | 5–3 (63%) | 0–6 (0%) | 97.6 | +0.42 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1653 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -84 | +168 | 48.8% | -0.10 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.7 | +0.09 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1586 | 92.7 | — | — | — | — | -28 | -65 | +209 | 28.0% | -2.28 | 2–3 (40%) | — | — | +0.24 |
| Career | 1816 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -98 | +18 | 48.5% | -0.14 | 43–42 (51%) | 31–29 (52%) | 102.2 | -0.65 | Career | 1927 | 142.7 | — | — | — | — | -21 | -97 | +127 | 49.6% | -0.13 | 96–79 (55%) | 46–56 (45%) | 98.2 | -1.84 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 1, 1996 | H2H |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | 5 | 0 | 5 | Feb 17, 1994 | H2H |
| Nicole Bradtke | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 20, 1993 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 2 | 9 | 11 | Feb 5, 1994 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 1, 1994 | H2H |
| Judith Wiesner | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 15, 1997 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 21, 1996 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 2, 1995 | H2H |