H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Linda Wild vs Laxmi Poruri H2H: 3-0
Linda Wild holds a 3–0 lead over Laxmi Poruri in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1995 Beijing third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1995* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Linda Wild | 7-5 6-2 | Laxmi Poruri | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1995* | Nagoya | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Linda Wild | 6-2 6-4 | Laxmi Poruri | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1994* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Linda Wild | 6-0 7-6 | Laxmi Poruri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Laxmi Poruri | #635 | #110 | 209 | 1,556 | 14 | 30 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Laxmi Poruri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #111 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |