H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Linda Wild vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-3

Lori Mcneil holds a 3–1 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1997 Stanford round of 32 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Linda Wild
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Wild #55 6-4 7-5 Lori Mcneil #148 Match data Jul 24, 1997* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lori Mcneil #25 6-3 5-7 6-2 Linda Wild #50 Match data Feb 11, 1994* R16 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #25 6-4 6-4 Linda Wild #64 Match data Jun 21, 1992* F Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Lori Mcneil #27 6-2 6-3 Linda Wild #60 Match data May 28, 1992* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Linda Wild #252 #23 823 1,815 135 146 48.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Linda Wild Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
1989 1–7 12.5% #155 1,457 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
1990 9–12 42.9% #86 1,554 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
1991 20–19 51.3% #41 1,720 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
1992 19–21 47.5% #49 1,732 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
1993 24–18 57.1% #45 1,764 0 2 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
1994 20–19 51.3% #49 1,740 0 2 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
1995 17–13 56.7% #58 1,758 0 4 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
1996 22–16 57.9% #29 1,809 0 5 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
1997 3–14 17.6% #223 1,625 0 5 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
1999 0–3 0.0% #191 1,566 0 5 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
2000 0–3 0.0% #252 1,540 0 5 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
— — — — — — — 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
— — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
— — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
— — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
— — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
— — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
— — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
— — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Linda Wild Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1989 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1990 3 6 9 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
1991 8 9 17 47.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
1992 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
1993 15 9 24 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
1995 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
1996 15 10 25 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
1997 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 70 79 149 47.0% 19 30 49 38.8% 19 19 38 50.0% 27 18 45 60.0% Career 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Linda Wild Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1493 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
1989 1457 103.4 — — — — +30 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 — — -0.09 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
1990 1555 123.6 — — — — +1 -3 — 43.2% -0.52 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 -0.32 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
1991 1721 134.6 — — — — -71 -49 -115 50.0% -0.26 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 107.4 -0.67 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -89 -75 +45 47.8% -0.05 6–6 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 -1.52 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27
1993 1765 132.8 — — — — +27 -174 -41 56.4% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 99.5 +0.50 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20
1994 1741 132.8 — — — — -38 -164 +80 51.6% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 -1.90 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49
1995 1758 128.9 — — — — +19 -201 +14 58.0% +0.57 3–6 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 +1.45 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78
1996 1810 144.4 — — — — +25 -227 -22 55.2% +0.55 7–6 (54%) 6–8 (43%) 101.6 +0.67 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06
1997 1625 106.2 — — — — +96 -90 +72 25.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.19 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23
1999 1567 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.38 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
2000 1541 109.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.42 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career 1816 137.3 — — — — -7 -98 +18 48.5% -0.14 43–42 (51%) 31–29 (52%) 102.2 -0.65 Career 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.