H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Linda Wild holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1993 Chicago round of 32 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | 6-2 6-1 | Louise Field | Match data | Feb 11, 1993* | R32 | Chicago | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,815 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,550 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Linda Wild | Louise Field | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,625 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,540 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Linda Wild | Louise Field | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1972 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1992 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1987 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1993 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1988 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1989 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1995 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 1990 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1996 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1991 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | 70 | 79 | 149 | 47.0% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 19 | 19 | 38 | 50.0% | 27 | 18 | 45 | 60.0% | Career | 31 | 61 | 92 | 33.7% | 7 | 26 | 33 | 21.2% | 17 | 24 | 41 | 41.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Linda Wild | Louise Field | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1972 | 1493 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 1982 | 1488 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 |
| 1989 | 1457 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.06 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 | 1984 | 1485 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 1990 | 1555 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -3 | — | 43.2% | -0.52 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.4 | -0.32 | 1985 | 1518 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +108 | 42.9% | -0.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.31 |
| 1991 | 1721 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -71 | -49 | -115 | 50.0% | -0.26 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.4 | -0.67 | 1986 | 1480 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +34 | — | 26.7% | -1.53 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | +1.62 |
| 1992 | 1733 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -75 | +45 | 47.8% | -0.05 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.9 | -1.52 | 1987 | 1453 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +36 | +129 | 40.6% | -0.91 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.5 | +2.84 |
| 1993 | 1765 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -174 | -41 | 56.4% | +0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.5 | +0.50 | 1988 | 1413 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +55 | +117 | 30.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.10 |
| 1994 | 1741 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -164 | +80 | 51.6% | -0.05 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.6 | -1.90 | 1989 | 1543 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | -45 | -110 | +60 | 38.9% | -0.89 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.8 | +0.30 |
| 1995 | 1758 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -201 | +14 | 58.0% | +0.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.1 | +1.45 | 1990 | 1523 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -143 | +110 | 41.9% | -0.52 | 2–8 (20%) | 1–1 | — | +1.49 |
| 1996 | 1810 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -227 | -22 | 55.2% | +0.55 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.6 | +0.67 | 1991 | 1435 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -98 | — | 21.6% | -1.87 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–6 (25%) | 94.3 | +0.83 |
| 1997 | 1625 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | +96 | -90 | +72 | 25.6% | -2.15 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | +0.19 | 1992 | 1449 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 103.8 | +1.27 |
| 1999 | 1567 | 91.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.38 | 1993 | 1471 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 34.3% | -1.49 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.04 |
| 2000 | 1541 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.42 | 1994 | 1477 | 88.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.23 |
| Career | 1816 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -98 | +18 | 48.5% | -0.14 | 43–42 (51%) | 31–29 (52%) | 102.2 | -0.65 | Career | 1551 | 106.4 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -13 | +105 | 35.6% | -1.07 | 22–33 (40%) | 19–24 (44%) | 96.1 | +5.42 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 1, 1996 | H2H |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | 5 | 0 | 5 | Feb 17, 1994 | H2H |
| Nicole Bradtke | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 20, 1993 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Isabelle Demongeot | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Andrea Leand | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 10, 1990 | H2H |